0100DB2301

System Voltage Considerations

Abstract: In addition to factors such as load planning, system voltage selection is a fundamental aspect of electrical system design. The utilization voltage of equipment can be accomplished with various distribution system voltages. Typical considerations include utility connections, rate tariffs, distances to loads, costs and others. Selecting the appropriate system voltage allows efficiencies while managing the capital and maintenance expenditures.

Basic Principles

The selection of system voltages is crucial to successful power system design. Reference American National Standard Preferred Voltage Ratings for Electric Power Systems and Equipment (60Hz)* lists the standard voltages for the United States and their ranges. The nominal voltages from American National Standard Preferred Voltage Ratings for Electric Power Systems and Equipment (60Hz)* are given in Standard Nominal Three-phase System Voltages per ANSI C84.1-1989.

ANSI C84.1-1989 divides system voltages into “voltage classes”. Voltages 600 V and below are referred to as “low voltage”, voltages from 600 V - 69 kV are referred to as “medium voltage”, voltages from 69 kV - 230 kV are referred to as “high voltage”, and voltages 230 kV - 1,100 kV are referred to as “extra high voltage”, with 1,100 kV also referred to as “ultra-high voltage”. The emphasis of this guide is on low- and medium-voltage distribution systems.

Standard Nominal Three-phase System Voltages per ANSI C84.1-1989

Volatge Class Three-Wire Four-Wire
Low Voltage

240
480
600

208Y/120
240/120
480Y/277

Medium Voltage

2,400
4,160
4,800

13,800
23,000
34,500
46,000
69,000

4,160Y/2400
8,320Y/4800
12,000Y/6,930
12,470Y/7,200
13,200Y/7,620
13,800Y/7,970
20,780Y/12,000
22,860Y/13,200
24,940Y/14,400
34,500Y/19,920

High Voltage

115,000
138,000
161,000
230,000

Extra-High Voltage

Ultra-High Voltage

345,000
500,000
765,000
1,100,000

The choice of service voltage is limited to those voltages that the serving utility provides. In most cases, only one choice of electrical utility is available, and thus only one choice of service voltage. As the power requirements increase, so to does the likelihood that the utility will require a higher service voltage for a given installation. In some cases, a choice may be given by the utility as to the service voltage desired, in which case an analysis of the various options is required to arrive at the correct choice. In general, the higher the service voltage the more expensive the equipment required to accommodate it is. Maintenance and installation costs also increase with increasing service voltage. However, equipment such as large motors may require a service voltage of 4160 V or higher, and, further, service reliability tends to increase at higher service voltages.

Another factor to consider regarding service voltage, is the voltage regulation of the utility system. Voltages defined by the utility as “distribution” should, in most cases, have adequate voltage regulation for the loads served. Voltages defined as “subtransmission” or “transmission”, however, often require the use of voltage regulators or load-tap changing transformers at the service equipment to give adequate voltage regulation. This situation typically only occurs for service voltages above 34.5 kV, however it can occur on voltages between 20 kV and 34.5 kV. When in doubt, consult the serving utility.

The utilization voltage is determined by the requirements of the served loads. For most industrial and commercial facilities this is 480Y/277 V, although 208Y/120 V is also required for convenience receptacles and small machinery. Large motors may require 4160 V or higher. Distribution within a facility may be 480Y/277 V or, for large distribution systems, medium-voltage distribution may be required. Medium-voltage distribution implies a medium-voltage (or higher) service voltage, and results in higher costs of equipment, installation, and maintenance than low-voltage distribution. However, this must be considered along with the fact that medium-voltage distribution generally results in smaller conductor sizes and makes control of voltage drop easier.

Power equipment ampacity limitations impose practical limits on the available service voltage to serve a given load requirement for a single service, as shown in Equipment Design Limits to Service Voltage vs. Load Requirements, for a Single Service.

Voltage Drop Considerations

Because all conductors exhibit an impedance to the flow of electric current, the voltage is constant throughout the system, but tends to drop closer to the load. Ohm’s Law, expressed in phasor form for AC circuits, gives the basic relationship for voltage drop vs. the load current:

drop = Īl x Z̄cond

(4–1)

Where:

  • drop is the voltage drop along a length of conductor or across a piece of equipment in V,

  • Īl is the load current in A, and

  • cond is the conductor or equipment impedance, in Ohms.

Thus, the larger the load current and larger the conductor impedance, the larger the voltage drop. Unbalanced loads, of course, give an unbalanced voltage drop, which leads to an unbalanced voltage at the utilization equipment.

Section 210.19(A) – branch circuits – Informational Note N° 3 recommends the voltage drop at the farthest outlet of power, heating, and lighting, or combination of such loads, to three percent of the applied voltage. Alternatively, the maximum combined voltage drop on the feeder and branch circuits to the farthest outlet should be five percent.

Section 215.2(A)(1) – feeders – Informational Note N° 2 has the same recommendations for feeders.

Those statements mean that the feeder could have a one percent voltage drop if the branch circuit had no more than four percent. Also, limiting the branch circuit voltage drop to three percent allows a two percent drop in the feeder. These or any other combinations of feeder and branch circuit voltage drops not exceeding a total of five percent are adequate.

A voltage drop of five percent or less from the utility service to the most remotely-located load is recommended by NEC article 210.19(A)(1), FPN No. 4. Because this is a note only, it is not a requirement per se but is the commonly accepted guideline.

Equipment Design Limits to Service Voltage vs. Load Requirements, for a Single Service

Voltage (V) Equipment Type Maximum Equipment Ampacity (A)

Maximum Load (kVA)

208
480
600

Switchboard or Low-Voltage Power Switchgear

5000

1,800
4,157
5,196

2,400
4,160
4,800

Metal-Enclosed Switchgear,
w/Fuses

1080

4,489
7,782
8,979

6,900
8,320
12,000
12,470
13,200
13,800

720

8,605
10,376
14,965
15,551
16,461
17,210

20,780
22,860
23,000
24,940

175

6,299
6,929
6,972
7,560

34,500

115

6,872

2,400
4,160
4,800
6,900
8,320
12,000
12,470
13,200
13,800

Metal-Clad Switchgear

3000

12,471
21,616
24,942
38,853
43,232
62,354
64,796
68,589
71,707

20,780
22,860
23,000
24,940

2000

71,984
79,189
79,674

86,395

Because conductor impedance increases with the length of the conductor, unless the power source is close to the center of the load, the voltage varies across the system, and, further, it can be more costly to maintain the maximum voltage drop across the system to within five percent of the service voltage since larger conductors must be used to offset longer conductor lengths.

Also, from equation (4-1) as load changes, so does the voltage drop. For a given maximum load, a measure of this change at a given point is the voltage regulation, defined as:

Voltage Regulation = IV̄no load I – IV̄loadI/IV̄loadI x 100%

(4–2)

Where:

  • no load is the voltage, at a given point in the system, with no load current flowing from that point to the load.

  • load is the voltage, at the same point in the system, with full load current flowing from that point to the load.

Another source of concern when planning for voltage drop is the use of power-factor correction capacitors. Because these serve to reduce the reactive component of the load current, they also reduce the voltage drop per equation (4-1).

Both low and high voltage conditions, and voltage imbalance, have an adverse effect on utilization equipment (see IEEE Recommended Practice for Electric Power Distribution for Industrial Plants* for additional information). Voltage drop must therefore be considered during power system design to avoid future problems.

QR Code is a registered trademark of DENSO WAVE INCORPORATED in Japan and other countries.

Was this helpful?